Home Page
MAILSON DA NÓBREGA - www.tendencias.com.br - em artigo sob o título Como
crescer (publicado no jornal O ESTADO DE S. PAULO, 31.10.2004, p. B-3), retoma
a abordagem da Teoria Neo-Institucional, que este Cidadão teve oportunidade de ouvi-lo
falar na palestra Perspectivas da Economia Brasileira, em 25 de agosto próximo
passado, em um evento do MBA/FIA, lá na FACULDADE
DE ECONOMIA E ADMINISTRAÇÃO da UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO - www.fia.com.br/portalmba -
A idéia básica da teoria
é explicitar o relevante papel das pessoas físicas e/ou jurídicas no desenvolvimento,
envolvendo aqueles agentes econômicos e suas crenças ou regras de ação, podendo ser
melhor pesquisada a partir do pensamento dos ganhadores do Prêmio Nobel de 1991 (RONALD
COASE) e de 1993 (ROBERT FOGEL e DOUGLASS NORTH), cujos resumos estão disponíveis em - www.nobelprize.org - valendo de ilustração para
este hipertexto os seguintes parágrafos que noticiam a premiação de um daqueles, in
verbis:
"Breakthrough in
Understanding the Institutional Structure of the Economy
Until recently, basic
economic analysis concentrated on studying the functioning of the economy in the framework
of an institutional structure which was taken as given. Efforts to explain the
institutional structure were usually considered unnecessary or futile. For instance, the
existence of organizations of the type we call firms seemed almost self-evident. Observed
variations in contract forms in the economic sphere were also regarded as a given fact,
and the laws and rules of the legal system were perceived as an externally imposed setting
for economic activity.
By means of a radical
extension of economic micro theory, Ronald Coase succeeded in specifying principles
for explaining the institutional structure of the economy, thereby also making new
contributions to our understanding of the way the economy functions. His achievements have
provided legal science, economic history and organization theory with powerful impulses
and are therefore also highly significant in an interdisciplinary context. Coase's
contributions are the result of methodical research work, where each segment was gradually
added to the next over a period of many years. It took a long time for his approach to
gain a foothold. When the breakthrough finally occurred during the 1970s and 1980s, it was
all the more emphatic. Today Coase's theories are among the most dynamic forces behind
research in economic science and jurisprudence.
Coase showed that
traditional basic microeconomic theory was incomplete because it only included production
and transport costs, whereas it neglected the costs of entering into and executing
contracts and managing organizations. Such costs are commonly known as transaction costs
and they account for a considerable share of the total use of resources in the economy.
Thus, traditional theory had not embodied all of the restrictions which bind the
allocations of economic agents. When transaction costs are taken into account, it turns
out that the existence of firms, different corporate forms, variations in contract
arrangements, the structure of the financial system and even fundamental features of the
legal system can be given relatively simple explanations. By incorporating different types
of transaction costs, Coase paved the way for a systematic analysis of institutions in the
economic system and their significance.
Coase also demonstrated
that the power and precision of analysis may be enhanced if it is carried out in terms of
rights to use goods and factors of production instead of the goods and factors themselves.
These rights, which came to be called "property rights" in economic analysis,
may be comprised of full ownership, different kinds of usership rights or specific and
limited decision and disposal rights, defined by clauses in contracts or by internal rules
in organizations. The definition of property rights and their distribution among
individuals by law, contract clauses and other rules determine economic decisions and
their outcome. Coase showed that every given distribution of property rights among
individuals tends to be reallocated through contracts if it is to the mutual advantage of
the parties and not prevented by transaction costs, and that institutional arrangements
other than contracts emerge if they imply lower transaction costs. Modifications of legal
rules by courts and legislators are also encompassed by these arrangements. Property
rights thus constitute a basic component in analyses of the institutional structure of the
economy. In perhaps somewhat pretentious terminology, Coase may be said to have identified
a new set of "elementary particles" in the economic system. Other researchers,
to some extent under the influence of Coase, have also made pioneering contributions to
the study of property rights.
(....)"
Nesse contexto, a
construção de um Terceiro Setor forte e atuante é parte daquele desenvolvimento,
cabendo a Você Cidadania uma parcela de responsabilidade importante naquela missão que
pode ser individual ao começar, e coletiva ao caminhar...
A própria atuação
institucional dos programas sociais das FORÇAS ARMADAS, as ações coletivas do
MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO, as denúncias da Mídia envolvendo recursos públicos, e a
performance deste Tio Patinhas Cidadão em petições administrativas e/ou ações
populares faz parte daquele contexto microeconômico com efeitos macroeconômicos!;-)
Economicamente,
Carlo$ Perin Filho
Home Page
|